Cases 21 - 30 of 1,910
Rodrigues et al v. City of Brockton et al
as 1:2023cv12724
Plaintiff:
Djason Rodrigues, Danielson Rodrigues and Jason Mosley
Defendant:
City of Brockton, City of Brockton Police Department, Mayor Robert F. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lockley v. Cotto-Davila et al
as 3:2023cv01562
Plaintiff:
Tamieka Lashawn Lockley
Defendant:
Orlando Cotto-Davila, Ileana Cruz-Velazquez, Juan Carlos Vera-Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 3:2023cv01573
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services, Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Actavis LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Vivian Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Betancourt-Perez
as 23-1895
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Claimant:
ANGEL ABNER BETANCOURT-PEREZ
Defendant:
ASSORTED JEWELRY
Perez-Ayala v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00494
Petitioner:
Brian Perez-Ayala
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ramos-Ramos, et al v. Olavarria-Cruz, et al
as 23-1940
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE A. RAMOS-RAMOS, ORLANDO MENDEZ-LOPEZ, IGNERIS A. PEREZ-ROSARIO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PHD MAYRA OLAVARRIA-CRUZ, in her official capacity as President of the University of Puerto Rico and SINDICATO DE TRABAJADORES DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE PUERTO RICO
Interested Party:
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION and others
Matul Macario, et al v. Garland
as 23-1985
Petitioner:
USIEL AROLDO MATUL MACARIO and NORMA CAROLINA PEREZ MATUL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
