Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Gilley v. Toney et al
as 5:2024cv00650
Defendant:
Alyssa Tiller Lester, Mary Johnson, Rebecca Damron and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Gilley and Kimberly Ann Gilley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Messer v. Moore et al
as 2:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Cleve H. Messer
Defendant:
Sgt. William Miller, Sgt. Timothy Perkins and Cpl. Alan Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amar v. PSIMED Corrections, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00425
Defendant:
John/Jane Does, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., PSIMED Corrections, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Amar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schubert v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Allan Schubert
Defendant:
M. Gonzales, S. Thorne, R. D. Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Barr et al
as 3:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:
Barry Barr, Brent Jackson, Lynn Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Williams v. Bob Barker Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00436
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Williams
Defendant:
Bob Barker Incorporated, 'Doe' Murphy, Lieutenant David Cavendish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Adams et al
as 5:2021cv00083
Defendant:
Mr. Minnick, M.P. Complex Warden Hudgins, Counselor T. Slinka Bean and others
Plaintiff:
Monica Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perkins v. Adams
as 5:2020cv00168
Petitioner:
Monica Perkins
Respondent:
Warden P. Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perkins v. State of West Virginia et al
as 2:2020cv00032
Defendant:
Federal Highway Administration and State of West Virginia
Plaintiff:
Jeff Perkins
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 31100
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
