Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Pierce #211005 v. Snow et al
as 1:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Perry Pierce #211005
Defendant:
Unknown Snow, D. Baker and Unknown Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Robinson
as 4:2024cv00570
Petitioner:
James Eugene Pierce
Respondent:
Warden Norm Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. LeMaster
as 0:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
David L. Pierce
Respondent:
David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ross v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Terrell Ross
Defendant:
Kent, County of, Kent County Correctional Facility, Grand Rapids, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Davidson County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2023cv00962
Plaintiff:
Cornelius D. Pierce
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff Office, Darron Hall, Carla Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00086
Petitioner:
David L. Pierce
Respondent:
Warden David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roger Pierce v. Williams, et al
as 23-1800
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER PIERCE
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT WILLIAMS, SERGEANT . BURLERSON, OFFICER SMOLINSKI and others
Roger Pierce v. Washtenaw County, MI Jail, et al
as 23-1796
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER PIERCE
Defendant / Appellee:
WASHTENAW COUNTY, MI JAIL, DARYL PARKER, Doctor, PATRICE MORGAN and others
John Pierce v. Bryan Morrison
as 23-1723
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN EARL PIERCE
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
Ray Heid, et al v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 23-3367
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAY SCOTT HEID and JAMES E. DAMRON
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY C. MOHR, Director, ROGER WILSON, Chief Inspector, TREVOR CLARK, Individually and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
