Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Robertson v. Guy M. Beaty, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00003
Plaintiff:
Vivian Doris Robertson
Defendant:
Guy M. Beaty, Inc. and Berkeley Mid-Atlantic Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
HOLMES v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2014cv00864
Plaintiff:
ANTONE A. HOLMES
Defendant:
WILLIS RICHARD BRYANT, A. L. BOUK, J. N. WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Atkinson et al
as 5:2014ct03227
Plaintiff:
Ardell L. Jenkins
Defendant:
Kenny Atkinson, Federal Medical Center, Lt. Myrick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Apker
as 5:2013hc02274
Petitioner:
Derrick Lamont Robertson
Respondent:
Craig Apker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ERLWEIN et al v. WATLINGTON et al
as 1:2013cv00986
Plaintiff:
THEODORE ERLWEIN and HIGH SIERRA CONSULTING, LLC
Defendant:
ROBBIN EUGENE WATLINGTON , HLC GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. and RAYMOND ROBERTSON
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Corpening-Bey v. City of Asheville et al
as 1:2013cv00255
Plaintiff:
Shawn Corpening-Bey
Defendant:
City of Asheville, Asheville Housing Authority, Walt Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Willingham v. Watkins et al
as 1:2013de00169
Plaintiff:
Charles Willingham
Defendant:
D. Watkins, K. Robertson, Asst. Wilder and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Dunbar et al
as 5:2012ct03210
Plaintiff:
William G. Robertson
Defendant:
Angela Dunbar, Jennifer Saad, Bruce Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVENS v. GULLEDGE et al
as 1:2012cv01065
Plaintiff:
DEMARCUS ANTWAIN RIVENS
Defendant:
TONY GULLEDGE, STEVE G. REDMOND, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. Cooper et al
as 3:2012cv00454
Plaintiff:
Yu'Sunrus Bey
Defendant:
Roy Cooper , Elaine F. Marshall , Martha H. Curran and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
