Cases 31 - 40 of 73
SOLTYS V. ROBERTSON, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv00606
Defendant:
RAYMOND CARROLL ROBERTSON, JR. and J & D LANCASTER, INC
Plaintiff:
ADAM P. SOLTYS
Mediator:
GARY S. HEMRIC
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
ROBERTSON v. ULSTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
as 1:2017cv00370
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ROBERTSON
Defendant:
ULSTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTSON et al v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
as 1:2017cv00235
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ROBERTSON and KERI ROBERTSON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, et al v. THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, et al
as 1:2016cv01274
Defendant:
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS , A. GRANT WHITNEY, JR. , RHONDA K. AMOROSO and others
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP , MOORE COUNTY BRANCH OF THE NAACP , JAMES EDWARD ARTHUR, SR. and others
Interested_party:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1971
ROBERTSON v. REGIONAL ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
as 1:2016cv01246
Plaintiff:
OLLIE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
REGIONAL ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LOGGANS V. LYNCH, ET AL.
as 1:2016cv00216
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER LOGGANS
Defendant:
PEGGY LYNCH, REID MULLIS, MARK E. SHELLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharpe v. Robertson
as 5:2015ct03314
Plaintiff:
Antwan J. Sharpe
Defendant:
Officer Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Robertson v. Bell et al
as 5:2015ct03097
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lamont Robertson
Defendant:
N. Bell, B. Brooks, P. Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
