Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Clervrain v. Haget et al
as 2:2022cv02225
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Tre Haget, Christopher Erlewine, John E. Hyten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Schwartz v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2021cv00239
Defendant:
Rutherford County and Chief f/n/u Fly
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schwartz v. Korn et al
as 1:2019cv00207
Defendant:
Floyd Davis, CoreCivic America, Trinity Food Service and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bingham v. Riles et al
as 2:2019cv02388
Defendant:
Barry Dority, Bobby Riles, Dr. Johnny E. Bates and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Bingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schwartz v. Well Path Health Services et al
as 1:2019cv00099
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Schwartz
Defendant:
Sexton, Medlin, Core Civic America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schwartz v. Mr.Korn et al
as 1:2019cv00056
Defendant:
Sexton, Core Civic America, Mr.Korn and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen et al v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc et al (TV1)
as 3:2018cv00153
Plaintiff:
Stormy Dunn, Kathy McCollum, Corey Buchannon and others
Defendant:
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., EnSafe Engineering Services, Rogers Group Investments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Lewis et al v. CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. (TV3)
as 3:2013cv00675
Defendant:
CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. , Pete E Almeida, American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lewis, Lorraine Lewis, Richard L Lewis, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
