Cases 21 - 30 of 143
Harrison et al v. Kang et al
as 3:2020cv02961
Defendant:
Yujing Chen, Suting Kang and Shuting Kang
Plaintiff:
Sophie Harrison and Jarrod Lee Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shutes v. Payne
as 4:2020cv00424
Plaintiff:
Carlton Shutes
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Spillard v. Costa et al
as 2:2020cv00705
Plaintiff:
Everett L. Spillard, II
Defendant:
Bick, Lvn Umanah, Costa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Spillard v. Costa et al
as 2:2020cv00702
Plaintiff:
Everett L. Spillard, II
Defendant:
Bick, Kethinel, Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERCIS B.V. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2020cv01448
Plaintiff:
MERCIS B.V.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", MSG, SIMAO GIFT Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
PENN JERSEY PAPER CO. v. SHUTE et al
as 2:2020cv00920
Defendant:
THOMAS SHUTE and SOUTH JERSEY PAPER PRODUCTS
Plaintiff:
PENN JERSEY PAPER CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02147
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hopkins v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 1:2019cv05479
Defendant:
Doctor Shute, Doctor Cordoba, Wexford Health Sources and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy R. Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KANG v. Harrison et al
as 4:2018cv05398
Plaintiff:
SHUTING KANG
Defendant:
Sophie Harrison, Jarrod Harrison and Shengrun International Industry Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kang v. Harrison et al
as 3:2018cv05399
Plaintiff:
SHUTING KANG
Defendant:
Sophie Harrison, Jarrod Harrison and Shengrun International Industry Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
