Cases 1 - 10 of 365
Lane v. Baker et al
as 1:2024cv11271
Defendant:
Charles D Baker, Charlie Baker, Barbara McCarthy and others
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Sosa v. Mass. DOC., et al
as 24-1433
Plaintiff:
CHE BLAKE SOSA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, JAMES J. SABA, former Superintendent, MCI Cedar Junction, in his official and individual capacities, LUIS S. SPENCER, former Commissioner of the Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities and others
Noble v. Napier
as 24-1377
Petitioner:
THOMAS E. NOBLE
Respondent:
STEPHANIE NAPIER, Acting Warden, FMC Devens
In Re: Noble
as 24-1372
Petitioner:
THOMAS E. NOBLE
Respondent:
STEPHANIE NAPIER, Acting Warden, FMC Devens
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jeannite v. Melendez et al
as 1:2024cv10698
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
Christopher Melendez, Brian Gravel, Anthony Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Montgomery v. 1st Source Bank
as 1:2024cv10694
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Montgomery
Defendant:
1st Source Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Baltas v. Salisbury, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Joe J. Baltas
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr., Rui Diniz, Barry Weiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Speight v. Kaelblein et al
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Speight
Defendant:
Amanda Kaelblein, Michael Kaelblein, Nancy Kaelblein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sanders v. Renaud et al
as 1:2024cv10165
Plaintiff:
Devon Sanders
Defendant:
Cheryl A. Renaud, Krystle Brown, Amy Boncher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
