Cases 41 - 50 of 267
Stickney v. Hyatte
as 3:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Tanner Stickney
Defendant:
W. Hyatte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stickney v. Hyatt
as 1:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Tanner Stickney
Defendant:
William Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stickney v. Hyatt
as 3:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Tanner Stickney
Defendant:
William Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greyer v. Tanner et al
as 2:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Stephanie F Greyer
Defendant:
FBI Agent Tanner, FBI Agent Pacaaski and FBI Agent Fhlartanane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Townsend v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv03017
Petitioner:
Robert Townsend
Respondent:
United States of America, Sarah Seberger, Tanner Kale Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Townsend v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv03003
Petitioner:
Robert Townsend
Respondent:
United States of America, Sarah Elizabeth Seberger, Tanner Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Townsend v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Robert Townsend
Defendant:
United States of America, Sarah Seberger, Tanner Kale Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Townsend v. Tanner Jacobs, et al
as 21-3375
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT TOWNSEND
Defendant / Appellee:
TANNER KALE JACOBS, SARAH ELIZABETH SEBERGER, DOUGLAS J. QUIVEY and others
Coultas v. Tanner et al
as 3:2021cv01624
Plaintiff:
Shannon Coultas
Defendant:
Julie Tanner and Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Jacobs et al
as 1:2021cv06548
Plaintiff:
Robert Townsend
Defendant:
Tanner K. Jacobs, Sarah E. Seberger, Douglas J Quivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
