Cases 1 - 10 of 512
Fidelity Warranty Services, Inc. v. Six M's II, LLC d/b/a Chrysler of Lawrenceburg et al
as 9:2024cv81159
Plaintiff:
Fidelity Warranty Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Six M's II, LLC d/b/a Chrysler of Lawrenceburg and Marcus D Withers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Fidelity Warranty Services, Inc. v. Six M's II, LLC d/b/a Chrysler of Lawrenceburg et al
as 0:2024cv61760
Defendant:
Six M's II, LLC d/b/a Chrysler of Lawrenceburg and Marcus D Withers
Plaintiff:
Fidelity Warranty Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Withers v. Last Energy, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv02162
Plaintiff:
Ashley Withers
Defendant:
The Circuit Court In and For Pinellas County, Florida, Last Energy, Inc. and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Victoria v. Warden, Coleman I et al
as 5:2024cv00358
Defendant:
FNU Kincade, FNU Carbonell, FNU Seabass and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Victoria
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Iriarte-Tupano v. Withers
as 7:2024cv01099
Petitioner:
Gypsy Iriarte-Tupano
Respondent:
Shannon D Withers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Withers v. Walmart Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
Joyceiana Withers
Defendant:
Sams East Inc, Walmart Inc and Walmart Louisiana L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hernandez-Rodriguez v. Withers
as 3:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Cesar Hernandez-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Warden Shannon D. Withers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Figueroa-Ospina v. Withers
as 3:2024cv00462
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Carlos Enrique Figueroa-Ospina
Defendant:
Warden Shannon D. Withers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Withers et al vs Sequoia Real Estate, Inc
as 4:2024cv04789
Plaintiff:
Josh Withers
Defendant:
Sequoia Real Estate, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Suddath Van Lines, Inc. et al v. Mayflower Transit, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Daryl Flood Relocation, Inc., Suddath Relocation Systems of Melbourne, Inc., Suddath Van Lines, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mayflower Transit, LLC, Unigroup, C.A. and United Van Lines, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
