Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Fuqua v. Publix Super Markets Inc
as 3:2026cv00904
Plaintiff:
Ellen Fuqua
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Dianne Fuqua v. Playtika, Ltd., et al
as 26-5364
Plaintiff:
DIANNE FUQUA
Defendant:
PLAYTIKA, LTD. and PLAYTIKA HOLDING CORP.
Fuqua v. Santa Fe County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2026cv01895
Plaintiff:
Scott Fuqua
Defendant:
Santa Fe County Board of Commissioners, Santa Fe County Adult Detention Facility, Derek Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Fuqua et al v. Kaur
as 1:2026cv00860
Defendant:
Kulwant Singh and Darshan Kaur doing business as Aman Trucking
Plaintiff:
Scott Fuqua
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Wrongful Death
Fuqua v. FBI et al
as 1:2026cv01867
Plaintiff:
Antwionne A. Fuqua
Defendant:
FBI, CIA, Bioethics Commitee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuqua v. Wells
as 1:2025cv03891
Plaintiff:
Chance Logan Fuqua
Defendant:
Kenneth Ronald Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fuqua v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2026cv00243
Plaintiff:
Scott Fuqua and Joelynn Yazzie
Defendant:
United States Of America and Rehoboth McKinley Christian Health Care Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Aldamuy et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11800
Plaintiff:
Mark Aldamuy, David Alger, Jason Anderson and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Amerex Corp, Archroma U.S., lnc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Fuqua v. Thornell
as 25-4323
Petitioner:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA
Respondent:
RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
