Cases 1 - 10 of 13
JOHNSON v. VIGO COUNTY AND THE VIGO COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 2:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
HALI JOHNSON
Defendant:
Vigo County and The Vigo County Board of Commissioners, John Plasse, Charley Funk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CMBG Advisors, Inc. v. Wayfinder Logistics LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01297
Defendant:
JOHN 1-10 DOE, Wayfinder Logistics LLC and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
CMBG Advisors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07509
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Next Level Sportsystems, Inc. v. S&S Activewear, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv05926
Defendant:
Yosef Simsoly, Staton Holdings Inc., Carolina Made Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Next Level Sportsystems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Latko v. Lochard et al
as 4:2016cv04277
Plaintiff:
Edward Latko
Defendant:
Hughes Lochard, Lisa Logsdon, Philip Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv01505
Plaintiff:
Roderick Smith and Joel Willis
Defendant:
City of Chicago , Sean Martin and JOHN 1-10 DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allstate Insurance Company v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv04163
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Company
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc. and JOHN 1-10 DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dantzler v. Lee et al
as 1:2013cv08447
Plaintiff:
George Dantzler
Defendant:
Durand Lee, City of Chicago and JOHN 1-10 DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01301
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
