Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02697
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00363
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv24562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Edible IP, LLC et al v. 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02405
Plaintiff:
Edible IP, LLC and Edible Arrangements LLC
Defendant:
1-800-Flowers.com, Inc. and 800-Flowers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv21239
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Packer v. Raging Captial Management, LLC
as 19-2852
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brad Packer, derivatively on behalf of 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc.
Defendant:
1-800-Flowers.com, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Raging Capital Master Fund, Ltd., William C. Martin and Raging Captial Management, LLC
Packer v. Raging Capital Management
as 19-2703
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Brad Packer, derivatively on behalf of 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc.
Defendant:
1-800-Flowers.com, Inc.
Defendant / Appellant:
Raging Capital Master Fund, Ltd., William C. Martin and Raging Captial Management, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01840
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Harrison v. 1-800-Flowers Team Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00410
Defendant:
1-800-Flowers Service Support Center, Inc., 1-800-Flowers Team Services, Inc. and 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Harrison
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05713
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
