Cases 1 - 10 of 163
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Breezy RDZ Enterprises LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Breezy RDZ Enterprises LLC doing business as Primo Sports Bar doing business as Primo doing business as Primo's Downtown McAllen, Mario E. Baez-Lugo doing business as Primo Sports Bar doing business as Primo's Downtown McAllen doing business as Primo and Maria Vasquez doing business as Primo Sports Bar doing business as Primo's Downtown McAllen doing business as Primo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC v. CDG ENTERPRISES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC
Defendant:
CDG ENTERPRISES, LLC doing business as 5TH AVENUE GRILL & BAR, JEFFREY DEES, JOSHUA GOODIN and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unlawful Reception Broadcast Signal i.e., Satellite Comm.
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Deonauth Enterprises, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Deonauth Enterprises, LLC doing business as Cecil's, Seeta Deonauth and Cecil Deonauth
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated v. Sand Bar Enterprises LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated
Defendant:
Sand Bar Enterprises LLC doing business as Sand Bar, Valerie Elisa Sutter, Rick Lynn Gaddis and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Breezy RDZ Enterprises LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Breezy RDZ Enterprises LLC doing business as Primo Sports Bar doing business as Primo, Alvaro Costilla doing business as Primo Sports Bar doing business as Primo, Maria Vasquez doing business as Primo Sports Bar doing business as Primo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. MHB Enterprises, LLC, et al.
as 5:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
MHB Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Scuzzi's Italian Restaurant, d/b/a Scuzzi's, and d/b/a Scuzzi Italian Grill, Morteza Bagheri and Maziyar Entezami
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Cocky 16 Enterprises, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv03797
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Cocky 16 Enterprises, LLC doing business as Texas T Tavern doing business as Texas T Tavern Bar, Boehm Industries, LP doing business as Texas T Tavern doing business as Texas T Tavern Bar, Archie Bennett doing business as Texas T Tavern doing business as Texas T Tavern Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. KHBJR Enterprise LLC et al
as 5:2023cv01235
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
KHBJR Enterprise LLC doing business as 4th Quarter Sports Bar and Kenneth H Baker doing business as 4th Quarter Sports Bar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. La Dinastia Enterprises, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01994
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
La Dinastia Enterprises, LLC doing business as Las 3 Mentiras doing business as Las 3 Mentiras Sports Bar, Esther D Ramirez doing business as Las 3 Mentiras doing business as Las 3 Mentiras Sports Bar and Nailea L Perez doing business as Las 3 Mentiras doing business as Las 3 Mentiras Sports Bar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. 77 Enterprises LLC et al
as 1:2023cv20653
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
77 Enterprises LLC d/b/a 77 Sport Bar, FERNANDO YANES, Yennyfer Zerpa and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
