Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Denker v. Zero Waste Recycling, LLC
as 3:2020cv00660
Plaintiff:
Randy Denker
Defendant:
Zero Waste Recycling, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
WALL RECYCLING, LLC v 3TEK GLOBAL, LLC
as 1:2020cv00371
Defendant:
3TEK GLOBAL, LLC
Plaintiff:
WALL RECYCLING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
D. M. Conlon, Inc. v. Cherry Creek Recycling LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00003
Plaintiff:
D. M. Conlon, Inc.
Defendant:
Cherry Creek Recycling LLC and The Guarantee Company of North America USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D. M. Conlon, Inc. v. Cherry Creek Recycling LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00011
Plaintiff:
D. M. Conlon, Inc.
Defendant:
Cherry Creek Recycling LLC and The Guarantee Company of North America USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GLENN v. METECH RECYCLING INC. et al
as 1:2019cv01066
Defendant:
ROBERT LAUGHLIN, REX CHANG and METECH RECYCLING INC.
Plaintiff:
GURLEY E. GLENN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carotrans International, Inc. v. Carolina Recycle Partners, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00448
Defendant:
David Carl Brinkley, Carolina Recycle Partners, LLC, David Allen Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Carotrans International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE CORP. V. NEW RIVER TIRE RECYCLING, LLC
as 1:2017cv01035
Defendant:
NEW RIVER TIRE RECYCLING, LLC
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WORSHAM V. DUFFY BOX & RECYCLING, INC., ET AL.
as 1:2017cv00993
Plaintiff:
RUTH WORSHAM
Defendant:
DUFFY BOX & RECYCLING, INC. and IGMAR "ALEX" BONILLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
