Cases 61 - 70 of 1,216
Sanborn v. O'Malley
as 24-1103
Plaintiff:
SIERRA SANBORN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Justiniano-Ramirez v. Social Security Administration, et al
as 24-1102
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JUSTINIANO RAMIREZ, MARIE V. PAGAN-LISBOA and DANIEL JUSTINIANO-RAMIREZ
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Boyle v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10198
Plaintiff:
Renee Lorraine Boyle
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fuentes v. O'Malley
as 24-1071
Plaintiff:
PETTY FUENTES
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Raquel L H v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Raquel Lopez Hiraldo
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
O'Loughlin v. O'Malley
as 24-1068
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN O'LOUGHLIN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Askew v. O'Malley
as 24-1051
Plaintiff:
I. A. and IVONETTE ASKEW
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Wright v. Martin et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
David Daoud Wright
Defendant:
Daniel Martin and John Doe 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Department of Children and Families
as 1:2024cv10083
Plaintiff:
Darnell James Martin
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
