Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Anglin v. Dickson, Tennessee, City of et al
as 3:2020cv00294
Defendant:
Jeff Lewis, Kirk Davidson, Zach Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
Hunter Anglin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anglin v. Phillips
as 3:2020cv00180
Petitioner:
Billy Anglin
Respondent:
Shawn P. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anglin v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2020cv02019
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail and Officer Jones
Plaintiff:
Barry Kendale Anglin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baskin-Robbins Franchising, LLC et al v. Anglin et al
as 3:2019cv00500
Defendant:
Clifford L. Moody and Brandon G. Anglin
Plaintiff:
BR IP Holder LLC and Baskin-Robbins Franchising, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Blocker v. Anglin et al
as 1:2015cv00038
Plaintiff:
Janice June Blocker
Defendant:
Hunter Anglin and Jodi Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael R. Anglin et al v. Arbon Equipment Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv00096
Defendant:
Arbon Equipment Corporation and Rite-Hite Holding Corporation
Plaintiff:
Michael R Anglin and Ashley Anglin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anglin v. Drury Hotels Company, LLC
as 2:2013cv02908
Plaintiff:
Randall Anglin
Defendant:
Drury Hotels Company, LLC
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anglin v. Hardin Co. Jail et al
as 1:2011cv01133
Plaintiff:
Rickey D. Anglin
Defendant:
Hardin Co. Jail and Howard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anglin v. Hardin Co. Jail et al
as 3:2011cv00455
Plaintiff:
Rickey D. Anglin
Defendant:
Hardin Co. Jail and Howard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kurita v. State Primary Board of the Tennessee Democratic Party, The et al
as 3:2008cv00948
Plaintiff:
Rosalind Kurita, Rosalind Kurita, Rosalind Kurita and others
Defendant:
State Primary Board of the Tennessee Democratic Party, The, Paula Combs, Larry Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
