Cases 11 - 20 of 1,494
Castellon v. Ozark Motor Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Jose Castellon
Defendant:
Ozark Motor Lines, Inc. and Eric L. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Brown v. Bowles
as 1:2024cv00372
Petitioner:
James L. Brown
Respondent:
K. Bowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Monzon v. Rogers et al
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Roman Sebastian Monzon
Defendant:
L Rogers, Shenica Royster, Erick Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Brown v. Culpeper County Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
David F. Brown
Defendant:
Culpeper County Jail, Culpeper County Circuit Court and Dr. Micheal Cowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. State Farm Correctional Center
as 1:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Brown
Defendant:
State Farm Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mouring v. Daniels et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Layne Mouring
Defendant:
Captain Daniels, Captain Jones, Lieutenant Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Ng
as 1:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Johnson, Katherine Nolan, Dale F. Stepka and others
Defendant:
Kathy Kar Po Ng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Brown v. State Farm Correctional Center
as 7:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Brown
Defendant:
State Farm Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Bowles
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
James L. Brown
Defendant:
Kemsy Bowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macias Vasquez v. Wilson, et al.
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Jose Cruz Macias Vasquez
Defendant:
Jason Wilson, Marquis Garner, Raymund Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
