Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3236
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Building and Realty Institute v. State of New York
as 21-2526
Plaintiff / Appellant: Building and Realty Institute of Westchester and Putnam Counties, Inc., Apartment Owners Advisory Council, Cooperative and Condominium Council and others
Defendant / Appellee: State of New York, RuthAnne Visnauskas, in her official capacity as Commissioner of New York State Homes and Community Renewal, Division of Homes and Community Renewal and others
G-Max Management, Inc. v. State of New York
as 21-2448
Plaintiff: 66 East 190 LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant: G-Max Management, Inc., 1139 Longfellow, LLC, Green Valley Realty, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee: State of New York, Letitia James, In her offical capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, RuthAnne Visnauskas, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal and others
Defendant: County of Westchester and City of Yonkers
Intervenor: N.Y. Tenants and Neighbors (T&N) and Community Voices Heard (CVH)
335-7 LLC v. City of New York
as 21-823
Defendant / Appellee: RuthAnne Visnauskas, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Division of Homes and Community Renewal, New York City Rent Guidelines Board, City of New York and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: 226 LLC, 431 Holding LLC, 699 Venture Corp. and others
Intervenor: 312 West 93rd Street Associates, LLC, Proposed
74 Pinehurst LLC. v. State of New York
as 21-558
Defendant / Appellee: J. Scott Walsh, In his official capacity as a Member of the Rent Guidelines Board, Alex Schwartz, In his official capacity as a Member of the Rent Guidelines Board, Patti Stone, In her official capacity as a Member of the Rent Guidelines Board and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Eighty Mulberry Realty Corporation, Dimos Panagoulias, 177 Wadsworth LLC and others
Amicus Curiae: Cato Institute and National Association of REALTORS
Petitioner: California Apartment Association, San Francisco Apartment Association and New York State Association of REALTORS, Inc.
74 Pinehurst LLC. v. State of New York
as 21-467
Defendant: Alex Schwartz, In his official capacity as a Member of the Rent Guidelines Board, Cecilia Joza, In her official capacity as a Member of the Rent Guidelines Board, City of New York and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Vasiliki Panagoulias, 141 Wadsworth LLC, Dimos Panagoulias and others
Defendant / Appellee: New York Division of Housing and Community Renewal, RuthAnne Visnauskas, Individually and in her official capacity as Commissioner of New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, State of New York and others
A Community Voice, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 21-70080
Petitioner: UNITED PARENTS AGAINST LEAD NATIONAL, NEW YORK CITY COALITION TO END LEAD POISONING, CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES AGAINST TOXICS and others
Respondent: ANDREW WHEELER, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Community Housing Improvement v. City of New York
as 20-3366
Plaintiff / Appellant: Vermyck LLC, Cindy Realty LLC, Mycak Associates LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee: Cecilia Joza, J. Scott Walsh, Sheila Garcia and others
Intervenor: Community Voices Heard (CVH), Coalition for the Homeless and N.Y. Tenants and Neighbors (T&N)
335-7 LLC et al v. City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01053
Plaintiff: 431 Holding LLC, 226 LLC, 335-7 LLC and others
Defendant: City of New York, Ruthanne Visnauskas and New York City Rent Guidelines Board
Petitioner: NY Tenants & Neighbors (T&N) and Community Voices Heard (CVH)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00322
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?