Cases 1 - 10 of 2,609
O'Neil v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02113
Petitioner:
David O'Neil
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. White et al
as 5:2024ct03146
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Williams, III
Defendant:
Dr. David White, Department of Adult Correction and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donley v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
David Donley
Defendant:
United States of America
DEESE et al v. FKH SFR PROPCO K, L.P. et al
as 1:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEESE and JEANNE DEESE
Defendant:
FKH SFR PROPCO K, L.P. and FIRSTKEY HOMES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
NEPTUNE v. COBBLE RIDGE HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
FRANTZ NEPTUNE
Defendant:
COBBLE RIDGE HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION and DAVID J. DARIGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
SEWELL v. BOP
as 1:2024cv00472
Petitioner:
DAVID ERIC SEWELL
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Neal v. Carter et al
as 5:2024ct03138
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neal and Christopher Lee Neal
Defendant:
RN Teresa Carter, P.A. Erica Kearney, Nurse Cora Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orr v. Cothron et al
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Eric Christopher Orr
Defendant:
David Cothron, Derek Price, Kevin Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Browning v. Mecklenburg County et al
as 3:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Pierre Browning
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County and David Lange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Balfour v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Craig Balfour
Defendant:
David Miller and U.S. Customs and Border Patrol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
