Cases 1 - 10 of 2,737
Valadez, III v. The City of San Antonio, et al
as 5:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Jose Daniel Valadez, III
Defendant:
Bryan Patten, Officer Flores and The City of San Antonio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Samtani v. City of Laredo
as 24-40327
Plaintiff:
Manoj R. Samtani, also known as Luvi Samtani, AS Number 1, a Minor Female Child and Anisha Samtani
Defendant:
City of Laredo, Laredo Police Department, Juan Jose Lazcano, III, In His Individual and Official Capacity and others
Flores v. County of Hidalgo
as 7:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Maria Teresa Flores
Defendant:
County of Hidalgo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Flores v. USA
as 6:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Romelia Flores
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hernandez v. Gutierrez et al
as 5:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Defendant:
David G. Gutierrez, Eric J.R. Nichols, Governor Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Flores Property Holdings LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Flores Property Holdings LLC and Jaime A. Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Aguilar et al v. MIA Interstate Express LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Rosa A Aguilar and robert flores ramos
Defendant:
MIA Interstate Express LLC, Cowtown Express Logistics LLC and Franknier Cinta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Campos-Flores v. Garland
as 24-60203
Petitioner:
Josue Antonio Campos-Flores and Ariela Julissa Iglesias-Ecolero
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Flores v. loandepot.com, LLC
as 4:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Flores, Jr.
Defendant:
loandepot.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
