Cases 1 - 10 of 768
Jones v. Patton et al
as 2:2024cv02060
Plaintiff:
Aiden Jones
Defendant:
Heather Patton, Jefferey Wayne Phillips, Carol Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Landerth et al
as 4:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Kendrick A Robinson
Defendant:
G Landerth, P Vanlandingham, Lakita Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tavron v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
DeLarron Keith Washington
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Jimmy Coleman, IV, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irvin-Bey v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Duane Irvin-Bey
Defendant:
G Smith and Does B.O.P. Admininistrative Staff, Forrest City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 5:2023cv05177
Plaintiff:
Angela G. Davis
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Jones v. Branham et al
as 4:2023cv00975
Plaintiff:
Aaron Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Curry Branham, Mixon, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Branham et al
as 4:2023cv00976
Plaintiff:
Christopher Green
Defendant:
Curry Branham, Mixon, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Branham et al
as 4:2023cv00974
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Wilson
Defendant:
Curry Branham, Mixon, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. USA
as 4:2023cv00888
Petitioner:
Eric G Hicks
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
