Cases 1 - 10 of 974
DAVIS v. HOKE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM LARRONTE DAVIS
Defendant:
HOKE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, JAMES HEDGPETH and CITY OF HOKE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hedgpeth v. Pettigrew
as 6:2022cv00377
Petitioner:
Gary Hedgpeth
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and Luke Pettigrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberto Cruz v. Anthony Hedgpeth
as 18-55601
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERTO CARLOS CRUZ
Respondent - Appellee:
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden
Gregory Smith v. Anthony Hedgpeth, et al
as 17-17009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY ANDRE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, L. TREXLER, Associate Warden of S.V.S.P., R. MACHUCA, Jr., Correctional Sergeant at S.V.S.P. and others
Erick Gonzalez v. A. Hedgpeth, et al
as 17-16139
Petitioner:
ERICK DANIEL GONZALEZ
Respondent:
A. HEDGPETH, DANIEL PARAMO, Warden and JOHN SUTTON
Christopher Simmons v. S. Zamora, et al
as 17-15658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ISAAC SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
S. ZAMORA, DOE, Chief Medical Office Doe, ROBERT KELDGORD and others
Oscar Morales v. Anthony Hedgpeth
as 16-16537
Petitioner - Appellant:
OSCAR MORALES
Respondent - Appellee:
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden
Leon Meyers v. Anthony Hedgpeth
as 16-16472
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEON L. MEYERS
Respondent - Appellee:
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, Warden
Seavon Pierce v. Scott McEwen
as 16-56177
Petitioner - Appellant:
SEAVON PIERCE
Respondent - Appellee:
SCOTT MCEWEN, Warden, also known as J. Sullivan, also known as Anthony Hedgpeth
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
