Cases 11 - 20 of 1,079
Kim Roberts Hedgpeth v. Giant Screen Films, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv07852
Defendant:
Kempf/Stern Production Company, LLC, Tornado Alley Film, LLC, Giant Screen Films, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Roberts Hedgpeth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roberto Cruz v. Anthony Hedgpeth
as 18-55601
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERTO CARLOS CRUZ
Respondent - Appellee:
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden
Gregory Smith v. Anthony Hedgpeth, et al
as 17-17009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY ANDRE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, L. TREXLER, Associate Warden of S.V.S.P., R. MACHUCA, Jr., Correctional Sergeant at S.V.S.P. and others
Kim Roberts Hedgpeth v. Kings Road Entertainment, Inc., et al
as 2:2017cv06917
Defendant:
Acme Nuts and Bolts, Acme Nuts and Bolts, LLC, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Roberts Hedgpeth
Erick Gonzalez v. A. Hedgpeth, et al
as 17-16139
Petitioner:
ERICK DANIEL GONZALEZ
Respondent:
A. HEDGPETH, DANIEL PARAMO, Warden and JOHN SUTTON
Christopher Simmons v. S. Zamora, et al
as 17-15658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ISAAC SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
S. ZAMORA, DOE, Chief Medical Office Doe, ROBERT KELDGORD and others
Jonathan Hedgpeth v. Ammar Rahim, et al
as 16-7146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jonathan Hedgpeth
Defendant - Appellee:
Ammar Rahim, District of Columbia Police Officer, individually and in his official capacity and Rider, DC Police Officer, individually and in his official capacity
Kim Roberts Hedgpeth v. Kings Road Entertainment, Inc.
as 2:2016cv08512
Defendant:
Does and Kings Road Entertainment, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kim Roberts Hedgpeth
Hedgpeth v. Colvin
as 7:2016cv00372
Plaintiff:
Sarah L. Hedgpeth
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Oscar Morales v. Anthony Hedgpeth
as 16-16537
Petitioner - Appellant:
OSCAR MORALES
Respondent - Appellee:
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
