Cases 1 - 10 of 794
ATS TREE SERVICES, LLC v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al
as 2:2024cv01743
Plaintiff:
ATS TREE SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Lina M Khan, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al v. Federal Trade Commission et al
as 6:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Business Rountable, Texas Association of Business and others
Defendant:
Federal Trade Commission and Lina Khan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
InterEx Inc. v. Khan et al
as 1:2024cv21529
Plaintiff:
InterEx Inc.
Defendant:
Humza Khan and Mattie Kyriakou
Khan v. PNC Bank
as 5:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Khalid K. Khan
Defendant:
PNC Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2024cv01066
Plaintiff:
MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL
Defendant:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and LINA M. KHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Khan v. Riddle et al
as 1:2024cv02481
Plaintiff:
Shiraz Khan
Defendant:
Kevin J. Riddle and Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
H&R Block Inc. et al v. Himes et al
as 4:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
H&R Block Inc., HRB Digital LLC and HRB Tax Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Jay L. Himes, Lina M. Khan, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Khan v. Stricklin, et al.
as 24-1446
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD KHAN
Defendant:
ROBIN STRICKLIN, SEAN TUMACDER, LORENA GOMEZ and others
Miller, et al. v. ManPow, LLC
as 24-1401
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MILLER, DONALD K. BAKE and SAAD KHAN
Defendant:
MANPOW, LLC
Duraisamy v. Sairam Babu, et al.
as 24-457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAGARAJAN DURAISAMY
Defendant / Appellee:
PRADEEP PULI RUKMANGATHA SAIRAM BABU, KOUSALYA NAGARAJAN, HCL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
