Cases 41 - 50 of 167
Lane v. Legal Department Boston Public Schools
as 1:2022cv10870
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Legal Department Boston Public Schools
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lane v. Brigham and Women's Hospital et al
as 1:2022cv10810
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Randi H Goldman, MD Raymond Manohar Anchan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lane v. Brigham and Women's Hospital
as 1:2022cv10869
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mendes et al v. Lane
as 1:2022cv10891
Plaintiff:
Jazmine Mendes, Sabine Templier, Evelyn Farrington and others
Defendant:
Luanita Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1430
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lane v. Mendes et al
as 1:2022cv10858
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Jazmine Mendes, Sabine Templier, Evelyn Farrington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Forman v. Jacobs et al
as 1:2022cv10567
Plaintiff:
Lane Forman
Defendant:
Charlie Jacobs, John Joines, Karen Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Arch Specialty Insurance Company a/s/o of Country Lane Estates Condominium Association, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Arch Specialty Insurance Company a/s/o of Country Lane Estates Condominium Association, Inc.
Defendant:
Hopedale Home Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
LANE v. CITY OF ROCKLAND et al
as 2:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
GLENNIS K LANE
Defendant:
CITY OF ROCKLAND, THOMAS LUTTRELL, CHRISTOPHER YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
