Cases 1 - 10 of 964
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Carroll Ray Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lewis
as 3:2024cv02965
Plaintiff:
Lisa O. Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Lewis v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2024cv11232
Plaintiff:
Tonia E Lewis
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Lewis v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Lois Lewis
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lewis v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Miranda Lea Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lewis v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Todd A Lewis
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lewis v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Todd A Lewis
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Michael Glenn Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Kim L. Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ahmad Lewis v. Martin J. O Malley
as 2:2024cv01794
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Lewis
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
