Cases 1 - 10 of 306
Peterson v. Murphree et al
as 4:2024cv00781
Defendant:
Denton County, Texas and Sheriff Tracy Murphree
Plaintiff:
Ryan Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Warren v. Allen et al
as 6:2024cv00297
Defendant:
Ashley Hobbs, Donna Allen, Dylan Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. McKennedy et al
as 6:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Richard David Peterson
Defendant:
David Able, Nancey McKennedy and Major Unknown Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Hall et al
as 4:2024cv02912
Respondent:
C. Peterson and Tanisha Hall
Petitioner:
Tamara Dawn Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Peterson v. 2905 Greenville Partners LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01362
Defendant:
Patrick Smith, Jeff Bekavac, PBA Hospitality Group LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jill Peterson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Lopez v. Kendall et al
as 5:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Arturo S. Lopez, Sr.
Defendant:
Frank Kendall, III, Daniel Peterson, Anthony Scharf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Peterson v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Gary Glenn Peterson
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Peterson v. FCI Seagoville et al
as 3:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Jua-Deno Peterson, Jr
Defendant:
FCI Seagoville, FNU Rivers, A Greenfeild and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Seibold et al
as 7:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
John Peterson, III
Defendant:
LT. S. Seibold, Msgt. T. Warner and Sgt. A. Ligon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
