Cases 1 - 10 of 1,430
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Nathan Carroll v. Northampton Restaurants, Inc.
as 24-1354
Plaintiff:
NATHAN E. CARROLL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, GERALDINE P. CORRIGAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, CRYSTAL A. BATEMAN and others
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON RESTAURANTS, INC., d/b/a Aberdeen Barn Steakhouse
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00651
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Elias Mejia Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1329
Petitioner:
ELIAS ISMAEL MEJIA RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Israel Veliz-Saenz v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1280
Petitioner:
ISRAEL VALENTIN VELIZ-SAENZ, ANA RUBI LOPEZ-RODRIGUEZ, DALIA MARGARITA VELIZ-LOPEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Burlington Insurance Company, The v. VIP Latino LLC et al
as 6:2024cv01453
Plaintiff:
Burlington Insurance Company, The
Defendant:
VIP Latino LLC doing business as VIP Latino Bar and Grill and Martin Tinajero Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jose Soloman-Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1236
Petitioner:
JOSE SOLOMAN-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney general
Nowlin et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
as 5:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Carmin Nowlin, Tamika Haley and Jesus Rodriguez
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Hall v. USA
as 3:2024cv00317
Petitioner:
Lavarius Rodriguez Hall
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McCreary v. USA
as 3:2024cv00307
Petitioner:
Jusamuel Rodriguez McCreary
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
