Cases 31 - 40 of 164
RODRIGUEZ v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv02142
Plaintiff:
CASANDER RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Lindsley v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2021cv00396
Defendant:
Terry Beck and Randy Rodriguez
Plaintiff:
Gary Allen Lindsley, Jr
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. MARTZ et al
as 1:2021cv00843
Defendant:
D. ALSIP, T. HOWARD, JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
THADDEUS RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RODRIGUEZ-RAMIREZ v. USA
as 3:2021cv00048
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
OSCAR RODRIGUEZ-RAMIREZ,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SWAILS v. MYERS et al
as 1:2021cv00045
Defendant:
Edward Rodriguez, Brad Shaw, Dana Karr and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Sankey, Richard L Swails, Richard W Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. VANIHEL
as 2:2021cv00011
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Petitioner:
JOSE RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
United States of America v. $19,980.00 and $6,640.00 in U.S. Currency
as 2:2020cv00442
Defendant:
$19,980.00 and $6,640.00 in U.S. Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Stephen M Komie, Ernesto Rodriguez and Josue Noboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Hughes-Rodriguez et al v. Hartman et al
as 1:2020cv00396
Defendant:
Internal Affairs of the Fort Wayne Police Department and Officer Kyle Hartman
Plaintiff:
M. R. and Jodi Hughes-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
