Cases 1 - 10 of 1,163
McCray v. McCray
as 4:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Stewart P McCray
Defendant:
Harry C McCray, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Gatewood et al v. Stewart et al
as 2:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Kimothy Gatewood and Herschel Crutcher
Defendant:
Anthony Stewart and ELS Freight LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Stewart v. Doordash, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Carla Stewart
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Only Choice Urgent Care & Med Spa et al v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated et al
as 0:2024cv01271
Plaintiff:
Only Choice Urgent Care & Med Spa and Stewart Scharfman Physical Therapy, PC
Defendant:
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, UnitedHealthcare, Inc. and Optum, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Stewart v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
Mary Howard Stewart
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Stewart v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
Matt Stewart
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Donald Stewart v. United States
as 24-1454
Petitioner:
Donald Stewart
Respondent:
United States of America
Stewart v. Compton
as 4:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Phillip Dewayne Stewart
Defendant:
Cathleen Compton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
James Stewart, Curtis James Walker, Corey Michael Walker and others
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation n/k/a Amtrak, Jennifer M. Harvey and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 rs Fed. Question: Federal Rail Safety Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
