Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 949
Cicchiello v. Peters et al
as 3:2024cv00855
Petitioner: Joan Cicchiello
Respondent: Colette Peters and R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jamar Travillion v. John Wetzel, et al
as 24-1763
Plaintiff: JAMAR L. TRAVILLION
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL, in his official capacity as the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's Secretary of Corrections, OFFICER STOVER, in his individual capacity, OFFICER LOSE, in his individual capacity and others
Cicchiello v. Stover
as 3:2024cv00655
Petitioner: Joan Cicchiello
Respondent: R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stover v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00863
Plaintiff: M. Andrew Stover
Defendant: AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hurley v. Stover
as 3:2024cv00593
Petitioner: Ashley Hurley
Respondent: R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stover et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv02340
Plaintiff: Collin Stover and Dana Stewart
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Richard Stover v. Carefactor, et al
as 24-3261
Plaintiff: RICHARD STOVER
Defendant: CAREFACTOR and KEGUTRIDGE
Hatley v. Stover
as 3:2024cv00331
Petitioner: Stephanie Ann Hatley
Respondent: R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bortner v. Stover
as 3:2024cv00332
Petitioner: Barbara Bortner
Respondent: Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Meyer v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv00438
Plaintiff: Madison Meyer
Defendant: County of San Diego, Kayla Valenzuela, Catherine Craft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?