Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Style Pantry LLC et al v. Hongkong Jigao I.T. Co Ltd et al
as 1:2018cv01981
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc., Hongkong Jigao I.T. Co Ltd, Shopify Inc and others
Plaintiff:
STYLE PANTRY LLC and Folake Kuye-Huntoon
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Styles v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 1:2018cv00125
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Styles
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Jelena Lazic, Shaun Rutherford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2017cv00302
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Bennett
Defendant:
John Wolfe, White, Valarie Styles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Styles et al
as 8:2017cv00031
Plaintiff:
James Young Washington
Defendant:
V. Styles, Officer Morris, ECI-Dietary Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Leibowitz et al
as 8:2016cv02645
Plaintiff:
Virna Daniels
Defendant:
Lori Leibowitz , Hong Park , Legal Aid Bureau Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Styles v. Triple Crown Publications, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv03759
Plaintiff:
Toy Styles
Defendant:
Triple Crown Publications, LLC, Triple Crown Productions, LLC and Vickie Stringer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. One 2001 Jaguar S Style
as 1:2009cv03298
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
One 2001 Jaguar S Style
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Styles v. George Washington University
as 8:2008cv02120
Plaintiff:
Gary Styles
Defendant:
George Washington University
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McCathern v. Style
as 1:2007cv01482
Plaintiff:
Sharon R. McCathern
Defendant:
Victor Walter Style, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
