Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Larry Jackson v. Matthew Mussion, et al
as 19-15040
Defendant:
WALKER, Dr., CORE CIVIC RED ROCK CORRECTIONAL CENTER and CORE CIVIC RED ROCK MEDICAL SERVICES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY W. JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW MUSSION and STOLC, Unknown
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Andre W. Jackson
as 17-2727
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDRE W. JACKSON, also known as RICKY CARMEN also known as RICKY JACKSON also known as ANTONIO WARFIELD also known as WALTER JACKSON
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. George Jackson
as 17-184
Petitioner:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INCORPORATED
Respondent:
GEORGE W. JACKSON
:
and
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Jackson
as 1:2016cv10263
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David W. Jackson
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Brownlow v. Boudreau et al
as 2:2016cv00235
Plaintiff:
Richard Curtis Brownlow
Defendant:
Steven Boudreau, Scott Belton, Michael W Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Winters et al v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. et al
as 6:2015mc00492
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Bussmann, Deanna M. Bussmann, Fred P. Bussmann and others
Interested Non-Party:
Bussmann Cranberries LLC
Defendant:
Ocean Spray Brands, LLC and Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc.
A & B Campbell Family et al v. Chesakpeake Energy Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00340
Plaintiff:
A & B Campbell Family , Eugene J Barrett, Jr. , Lori R Barrett and others
Defendant:
Chesakpeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Appalachia,L.L.C., Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
