Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 36,979
USA v. Leonard Williams
as 24-11439
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: LEONARD WILLIAMS
In re: Thomas McClary, et al
as 24-11397
Petitioner: In re: THOMAS MCCLARY and FIFTH AVENUE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, ORLANDO DIVISION, COMMODORES ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, DAVID FISH and others
Williams v. Mitchell et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00263
Plaintiff: Demericon Alex Williams
Defendant: Phillip Mitchell and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walleske v. Childs et al
as 8:2024cv01044
Plaintiff: Clarence E. Walleske
Defendant: Larry Childs, Ronterrious Williams, John Does 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ussery v. Law Office of Public Defender et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff: Roger Ussery
Defendant: Law Office of Public Defender and Kelly Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00062
Petitioner: STEPHON WILLIAMS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McCoy v. Jung
as 8:2024cv01035
Plaintiff: Quinton McCoy
Defendant: William Frederic Jung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
First Horizon Bank v. HomeTown Lenders Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00530
Plaintiff: First Horizon Bank
Defendant: HomeTown Lenders Inc and William E Taylor, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Williams v. Boulder Care
as 5:2024cv00535
Plaintiff: Dana D Williams
Defendant: Boulder Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00531
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?