Cases 1 - 10 of 10
v. Turner et al
as 8:2024cv01004
Defendant:
Ms. Layarnia Turner, Ms. Curtressa Huggins, Ms. Danelle Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ef Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
McBride v. CSX Transportation Inc et al
as 2:2015cv04110
Plaintiff:
William Michael McBride
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc and Professional Transportation Inc
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Williams v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2015cv00184
Plaintiff:
Donnie Williams
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Harry Williams v. US
as 12-2460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY JAMAL WILLIAMS, Proper Party Plaintiff
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Williams v. United States
as 8:2012cv02682
Plaintiff:
Harry Jamal Williams
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Michael Chertoff
as 08-2164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of United States Department of Homeland Security and WILLIAM BOULDIN, Chief Administrative Law Judge, United States Merit Systems Protection Board, Northeastern Regional Office, in his offical Federal Governmental capacity
CUMMINS v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 1:2008cv02536
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CUMMINS
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Brown v. United States Of America
as 1:2008cv00187
Plaintiff:
William Brown
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Wilder v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv02541
Plaintiff:
Lawrence V. Wilder, Sr.
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff and William Bouldin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
McCourt v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 2:2007cv00252
Plaintiff:
William H. McCourt
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
