Cases 11 - 20 of 774
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America v. Da La Mora (Huato)
as 23-8014
Defendant / Appellant:
ADALID CABRERA HUATO, China, Arana and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GIOVANNI DE LA MORA, ROGELIO RAMOS ROMAGUERA, TOMMY NEPONUCENO and others
Arana-De Ramos v. Garland
as 23-8007
Petitioner:
ROSA DE LA PAZ ARANA-DE RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Stewart v. Aranas, et al.
as 23-3832
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LEWIS STEWART
Defendant / Appellant:
ROMEO ARANAS and FRANCISCO M. SANCHEZ
Defendant:
CHERYL BURSON, S.L. CLARK, JAMES COX and others
Arana-Salazar v. Garland
as 23-7768
Petitioner:
ESMELIN RENE ARANA-SALAZAR and YOSSIMAR RENE ARANA-AC
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Arana v. R&S Concrete South, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv24353
Plaintiff:
GUILLERMO ARANA
Defendant:
R&S CONCRETE SOUTH, INC., ROGER & SONS CONCRETE, INC. and ANTONIO RODRIGUES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Woods v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2023cv00560
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Woods
Defendant:
Kara LeGrand, Erin Parks, Desiree Hultenschmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Federico A Arana v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv05667
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Federico A Arana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Fly v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Dane Fly
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron Ford, NDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
