Cases 1 - 10 of 67
CHAMBERS v. TICE et al
as 3:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
KAREEM CHAMBERS
Defendant:
WARDEN ERIC TICE, B. W. MILLER, TRAVSI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
B. W. v. Career Technology Center of Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2019cv01146
Defendant:
Valley View School District and Career Technology Center of Lackawanna County
Plaintiff:
B. W.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weiss et al v. Surgical Anesthesia Services, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01162
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Weiss , Kathy Weiss , M. W. and others
Defendant:
Surgical Anesthesia Services, LLC and Joe McDonnell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Sandra Ramaley, et al v. Babcock & Wilcox Power Generat, et al
as 16-1965
Plaintiff - Appellant:
APOLLO FACILITY PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee:
BABCOCK & WILCOX POWER GENERATION GROUP INC, as Successor-in-interest to Babcock & Wilcox Company, B&W TECHNICAL SERVICES INC, FKA B&W Nuclear Environmental Services Inc, ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO, predecessors-in-interest, successors-in-interest, subdivisions and subsidiaries and others
Russell Crocker, et al v. Babcock & Wilcox Power Generat, et al
as 16-1964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
APOLLO FACILITY PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee:
BABCOCK & WILCOX POWER GENERATION GROUP INC, as Successor-in-interest to Babcock & Wilcox Company, B&W TECHNICAL SERVICES INC, FKA B&W Nuclear Environmental Services Inc, ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO, predecessors-in-interest, successors-in-interest, subdivisions and subsidiaries and others
Reading Anthracite Company v. Klemenz et al
as 3:2016cv00535
Plaintiff:
Reading Anthracite Company
Defendant:
Kristen Klemenz, Boychuck's Coal & Stove, Inc., Boychuck's, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alynda Talmadge, et al v. Babcock & Wilcox Power Generat, et al
as 15-4077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
APOLLO FACILITY PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee:
BABCOCK & WILCOX POWER GENERATION GROUP INC, as Successor-in-interest to Babcock & Wilcox Company, ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO, predecessors-in-interest, successors-in-interest, subdivisions and subsidiaries and BABCOCK & WILCOX TECHNICAL SERVICES GROUP INC
Defendant:
B&W TECHNICAL SERVICES INC, FKA B&W Nuclear Environmental Services Inc
William Culp, et al v. Babcock & Wilcox Power Generat, et al
as 15-4078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM H. CULP, Personal representative of the Estate of Margaret S. Culp, deceased, and in his own right, DANA WESLEY SHELLHAMMER, CHERYL L. SWANK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BABCOCK & WILCOX POWER GENERATION GROUP INC, as Successor-in-interest to Babock & Wilcox Company, ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO, predecessors-in-interest, successors-in-interest, subdivisions and subsidiaries and BABCOCK & WILCOX TECHNICAL SERVICES GROUP INC
Defendant:
B&W TECHNICAL SERVICES INC, FKA B&W Nuclear Environmental Services Inc
Gloria Smith, et al v. Babcock & Wilcox Power Generat, et al
as 15-4076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLORIA MAE SMITH, as personal representative of the estate of EUGENE SMITH and GLORIA MAE SMITH, in her own right and PATRICIA ALDENE WEST
Defendant - Appellee:
BABCOCK & WILCOX POWER GENERATION GROUP INC, as Successor-in-interest to Babacock & Wilcox Company, ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO, predecessors-in-interest, successors-in-interest, subdivisions and subsidiaries and BABCOCK & WILCOX TECHNICAL SERVICES GROUP INC
Defendant:
B&W TECHNICAL SERVICES INC, FKA B&W Nuclear Environmental Services Inc
Marlene Ament, et al v. Babcock & Wilcox Power Generat, et al
as 15-4075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
APOLLO FACILITY PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee:
BABCOCK & WILCOX POWER GENERATION GROUP INC, as successor-in-interest to BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY, ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO, predecessors-in-interest, successors-in-interest, subdivisions and subsidiaries and BABCOCK & WILCOX TECHNICAL SERVICES GROUP INC
Defendant:
B&W TECHNICAL SERVICES INC, FKA B&W Nuclear Environmental Services Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
