Cases 1 - 10 of 190
Blake v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Blake
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Elmore et al v. Blake, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Samantha Mae Elmore and Robert William Elmore
Defendant:
Judge Blake, Jr. and Megan Maynor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tacy v. Blake et al
as 2:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
Gary Tacy
Defendant:
CO Beryl Blake, CO Jeremy Chee, West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandlain v. FCI McDowell Warden
as 1:2023cv00127
Petitioner:
Blake Sandlain
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sandlain v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00103
Petitioner:
Blake Sandlain
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden, Eric Rokosky, James White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Blake v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Charles Augustine Blake, Sr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sandlain v. Rokosky
as 1:2022cv00379
Petitioner:
Blake Sandlain
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Palmer v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
Michael Palmer
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, C. O. Richard Blake, C.O. Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sandlain v. Warden
as 1:2022cv00304
Petitioner:
Blake Sandlain
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sandlain v. Warden
as 1:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Blake Sandlain
Defendant:
FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
