Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Hankins v. The US Custom and Border Protection et al
as 7:2024cv00468
Defendant:
The US Custom and Border Protection and The US Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Plaintiff:
Timothy Omar Hankins, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Balfour v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00157
Defendant:
U.S. Customs and Border Patrol and David Miller
Plaintiff:
Craig Balfour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BORDERS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00497
Petitioner:
COREY DERON BORDERS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Clark v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
Lisa D. Clark
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
We CBD, LLC v. The United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
We CBD, LLC
Defendant:
US Customs and Border Protection, The United States of America and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Palomo Farms LLC/Hemport v. US Drug Enforcement Agency et al
as 4:2017cv00169
Plaintiff:
Palomo Farms LLC/Hemport
Defendant:
US Drug Enforcement Agency, US Customs and Border Protection, US Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Borders v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 3:2015cv00504
Plaintiff:
Christopher Borders
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Borders v. USA
as 5:2013cv00051
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jerome Lee Borders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Borders v. USA
as 5:2012cv00073
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jerome Lee Borders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00589
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
