Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Richard Boyle v. TracFone Wireless, Inc., et al
as 23-14100
Plaintiff:
RICHARD GERARD BOYLE
Defendant:
TRACFONE WIRELESS, INC. and MAGEN MENENDEZ
Boyle v. TracFone Wireless, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv24504
Plaintiff:
Richard Gerard Boyle
Defendant:
TracFone Wireless, Inc. and Magen Menendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Uzamere v. Uzamere et al
as 1:2022cv02745
Defendant:
Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, Austin I. Idehen, Esq., Democratic National Committee and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl D. Uzamere
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brannen et al v. City of Jesup, Georgia et al
as 2:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Rachel Brannen, Jason LaRoche, Matthew LaRoche and others
Defendant:
City of Jesup, Georgia, Mike Lane, Ray Boyles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Erpel v. U.S. Freedom Capital, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03935
Defendant:
Emily Tobolowsky, Allen Landerman PC, Dale Tillery and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Erpel and Eric Drake
Petitioner:
Caroline Meredith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF AND FOR OKALOOSA COUNTY et al
as 3:2019cv01547
Plaintiff:
LARRY BENNETT TURNER, JR
Defendant:
NATHAN BOYLES, GRAHAM FOUNTAIN, CAROLYN KETCHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Wilkie et al (MAG+)
as 3:2019cv00200
Defendant:
Sharon Hicks, Clyde W. Marsh, Robert Wilkie and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv01530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
