Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Boyle v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Antoine Lee Boyle
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Trevor S. Foley, Jason Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyles et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00621
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Boyles and Robert Boyles
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Products, Inc., Depuy Synthes, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boyles v. USA
as 4:2023cv00607
Petitioner:
Rodney Boyles
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. City of Lake Ozark, Missouri et al
as 2:2023cv04081
Plaintiff:
Channer Jones
Defendant:
City of Lake Ozark, Missouri, Kelly Lowe, Adam Khachi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Precythe et al
as 6:2022cv03164
Plaintiff:
Jared Williams, Anthony Zarro, Antonio West and others
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Anna Boyles, Joan Reinkemeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Falkenrath et al
as 2:2021cv04208
Plaintiff:
Ira B Harris
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Alana Boyles, Jaron Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Bloom et al
as 4:2021cv01250
Plaintiff:
Tommy L. Phillips, Sr.
Defendant:
Ron A. Bloom, Louis DeJoy, Cindy Boyles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boyle v. Neil et al
as 4:2021cv00941
Plaintiff:
Bryan Boyle
Defendant:
Brandin Neil and City of St. Louis, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Precythe et al
as 4:2021cv00730
Defendant:
Jeff Norman, Unknown Frayler, Unknown Spark and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Z. Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Precythe et al
as 4:2021cv00233
Defendant:
Jeff Norman, Lieutenant Unknown Sparks, Unknown Wilford and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Z. Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
