Cases 21 - 30 of 4,872
Winding RESTRICTED FILER v. McClure
as 5:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding *RESTRICTED FILER*
Defendant:
Marc McClure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frankenfield v. Galveston County et al
as 9:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
Galveston County, Greg Russel and TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. State of Texas
as 24-40205
Plaintiff:
Jacque Kenshashwa Washington
Defendant:
State of Texas, City of Freeport, Texas, Brazoria County Court at Law No. 4 and others
Winding v. Cain
as 3:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Early et al
as 1:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lewis
Defendant:
Ms Early, C Garrett and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Lavar Nelson
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Austin Calvert, Sidney Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey v. R P D C Medical Dept et al
as 3:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Jamie H Lindsey
Defendant:
Medical Dept Richland Parish Detention Center, Kendra Vaughn and R P D C Medical Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frankenfield v. Goodall et al
as 9:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
FNU Smith, FNU Goodall, TDCJ Parole Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frankenfield v. Smith et al
as 9:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
FNU Smith and Unknown Others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soto-Martinez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Luis Soto-Martinez
Defendant:
Warden F C I Pollock and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
