Cases 41 - 50 of 19,230
Light v. Milini et al
as 5:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Colton Light
Defendant:
C. O. Milini, Angelo J. Viani, Katherine N. Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Peters et al
as 3:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Andrew C Phillips
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Warden Lovett and All staff employees in their individual capacities working in receiving and distribution mailroom (R&D) on the Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Diaz v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00204
Petitioner:
Jonathan C. Diaz
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hippolyte v. Brammer
as 1:2023cv00410
Petitioner:
Marthe Hippolyte
Respondent:
C. Brammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hilton v. Brammer
as 1:2023cv00404
Petitioner:
Brandy D. Hilton
Respondent:
C. Brammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
v. Johnson et al
as 5:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Keith Dimitri Johnson
Defendant:
Mr. Merrick Garland, Mrs. C. S. Peters, Mr. C. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Staples, Bey v. Childress et al
as 2:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Don Juan Staples, Bey
Defendant:
H. Childress, Matt Hill, Officer Daber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meredith v. Brammer
as 1:2023cv00395
Petitioner:
Marquita Leigh Meredith
Respondent:
C. Brammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dixon v. Lovett et al
as 5:2023cv00187
Petitioner:
Dante Dixon
Respondent:
S. Lovett, P. Boch, K. Bigart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1211 - Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
