Cases 1 - 10 of 28
WHARTON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv00181
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
AGNES MARIE C. WHARTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Samantha Reed-Rajapakse v. Memphis Light Gas and Water, et al
as 13-6017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMANTHA REED-RAJAPAKSE
Defendant - Appellee:
MEMPHIS LIGHT GAS AND WATER, PRESIDENT JERRY COLLINS, CITY OF MEMPHIS and others
Hattie King v. A Wharton, et al
as 13-5501
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HATTIE L. KING
Defendant - Appellee:
A C WHARTON, Memphis Mayor, CITY OF MEMPHIS, CHARMEIA DOUGLAS and others
Kennith Van Buren v. Tony Armstrong, et al
as 13-5209
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNITH DEWAYNE LEE VAN BUREN
Defendant - Appellee:
TONY ARMSTRONG, MEMPHIS MAYOR A. C. WHARTON and CITY OF MEMPHIS
Derrick Brown v. Mark Luttrell, Jr., et al
as 12-5811
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., Former Sheriff, BILL OLDHAM, WILLIAM GIBBONS, District Attorney and others
Jacox v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2012cv02337
Plaintiff:
Rashad Jacox
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Memphis Police Department, A. C. Wharton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Wharton et al
as 2:2012cv02080
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Defendant:
A. C. Wharton, Memphis Police Dept. and Cindy Capps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newton v. Lawson et al
as 2:2011cv03037
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Newton
Defendant:
G. Lawson , Larry Godwin, Tony Armstrong and others
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Derrick Brown v. David Kustoff, et al
as 11-2793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID KUSTOFF, EDWARD L. STANTON, III, STATE OF TENNESSEE and others
Derrick Brown v. State of Tennessee, et al
as 11-2751
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENT, CITY OF MEMPHIS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
