Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Ruiz v. Hinojosa et al
as 2:2023cv02288
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Luis Felipe Calderon Hinojosa, Enrique Pena Nieto, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calderon v. USA
as 3:2023cv08071
Petitioner:
Jaime Calderon, Jaime Rene Calderon and Jaime Arredonde
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ruiz v. Calderon Hinejosa et al
as 2:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Luis Felipe Calderon Hinejosa, Enrique Pena Nieto and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calderon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Luis Calderon
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, M Gutierrez and S Waite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kelly v. Glendale, City of et al
as 2:2019cv05812
Defendant:
Glendale, City of, James Calderon, Brian Millick and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Remigio v. Calderon et al
as 2:2019cv05484
Defendant:
Unknown Calderon, Unknown McDowell, Unknown Santiago and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Remigio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2019cv02827
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Rudy Monarrez, Mesa, City of, Jhonte Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calderon v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2019cv02842
Plaintiff:
Carlos Calderon
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Arizona, State of and Maricopa, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Purrington et al
as 2:2018cv04556
Plaintiff:
Richard Wayne Thompson
Defendant:
Unknown Calderon, Ramon Bautista, Scott Purrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuerte-Calderon v. USA
as 2:2012cv00033
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Luis Fuerte-Calderon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
