Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Carey v. State Trooper Robert Gayewski, Jr. et al
as 1:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Maliq Carey
Defendant:
State Trooper Robert Gayewski, Jr., State Trooper Derek Leib and 1-6 John/Jane Doe State Troopers/Police Officers,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norman Steinberg v. K. Johnson, et al
as 22-2503
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORMAN STEINBERG
Defendant / Appellee:
K. KALONJI JOHNSON, THERESA M. TALBOTT, R.Ph, ROBERT B. FRANKIL, R.Ph and others
William Severino, III v. Office of Middlesex County Prosecutor, et al
as 22-1944
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM F. SEVERINO, III
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR, OFFICER ANDREW C. CAREY, CHIEF ALLYSA GAMBARELLA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Steinberg v. PA State Board of Pharmacy et al
as 1:2021cv01652
Plaintiff:
Norman Steinberg
Defendant:
PA State Board of Pharmacy, Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs, K. Kalonji Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02873
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSLEY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2020cv18885
Defendant:
ANDREW CAREY, TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, Police Officer Charles Zundel and others
Plaintiff:
Noah Mosley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
