Cases 41 - 50 of 773
Pokrant v. Austin, III et al
as 2:2022cv02412
Plaintiff:
Derek Clements, Cade Kloster, Zach Pokrant and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J Austin, III, Frank Kendall, Christine Wormuth and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Vasiliu v. Austin, III et al
as 2:2022cv02413
Plaintiff:
Derek Clements, Cade Kloster, Zach Pokrant and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J Austin, III, Frank Kendall, Christine Wormuth and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Kloster v. Austin, III et al
as 2:2022cv02411
Plaintiff:
Derek Clements, Cade Kloster, Zach Pokrant and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J Austin, III, Frank Kendall, Christine Wormuth and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 3:2022cv01056
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt State of Louisiana, City of Baton Organizations Act and Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 6:2022cv01065
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt State of Louisiana, City of Baton Organizations Act and Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Carey v. United States of America
as 22-6327
Petitioner:
THOMAS CAREY, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Clements v. Austin, III et al
as 2:2022cv02069
Plaintiff:
Derek Clements, Cade Kloster, Zach Pokrant and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J Austin, III, Frank Kendall, Christine Wormuth and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Alequin et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00765
Plaintiff:
Alequin, Deborah Kranz-Mitchell, Harvey Alequin and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
CAREY v. ETRADE INC
as 2:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
SETH T CAREY
Defendant:
ETRADE INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Wilson et al v. Austin III et al
as 4:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Wilson, Members of the Armed Forces for Liberty, Michael Groothousen and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Scott Wells, Annmarie Acevedo, William Timothy Adams and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin III, Acting Commissioner Janet Woodcock, Xavier Becerra and others
Amicus Curiae:
Pritish Vora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
