Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Becton v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2012cv00285
Plaintiff:
Carey Franklin Becton
Defendant:
City of Charlotte , Rodney Monroe , Thomas McGarity and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Grady v. Winders et al
as 5:2011ct03257
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Grady
Defendant:
Carey Winders and Fane Greenfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lackey et al
as 3:2011cv00414
Petitioner:
William Arthur Brown
Respondent:
Sydney Jerome Lackey, Charlie T. Davis, Luke J. Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Winders et al
as 5:2011cv00176
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Diane Brown
Defendant:
Carey Winders , Deputy Eric S. Pierce and Deputy John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Winders et al
as 4:2011cv00057
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Diane Brown
Defendant:
Carey Winders, Deputy Eric S. Pierce and Deputy John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010hc02099
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241
McMillan v. Moses Carey, Jr., et al
as 7:2009cv00208
Plaintiff:
TINA MCMILLAN
Defendant:
MOSES CAREY, JR. and Employment Security Commission
Mediator:
J. Anderson Little
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
ALBRIGHT et al v. INVISTA, S.a.r.l., LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00512
Plaintiff:
DEBRA DRANE ALBRIGHT and ROBIN CAREY ALBRIGHT
Defendant:
INVISTA, S.a.r.l., LLC, CNA HOLDINGS, INC., FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MACK v. FOX et al
as 1:2007cv00760
Plaintiff:
BENNIE AUSTIN MACK, JR.
Defendant:
CARL R. FOX, JAMES WOODALL, KENNETH C. TITUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
