Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Coleman v. State of North Carolina et al
as 2:2020cv00350
Defendant:
Katherine Cartwright, State of North Carolina, Edgar Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Richard Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riddick v. Barber et al
as 3:2019cv00071
Defendant:
Holly Ernouf, Dr. Galusha, Major Parham and others
Plaintiff:
Rashad Matthew Riddick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Croft v. Cartwright et al
as 8:2018cv03693
Defendant:
The County of Prince George's, Maryland, Angela Monique Dixon Van Croft, Ruby May Rainey Van Croft and others
Plaintiff:
Erika Lynne Laws Van Croft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Cartwright v. Town of Plymouth, NC
as 15-2180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT CARTWRIGHT and DENISE O. SAWYER, Administratrix of the Estate of Jonathan Sawyer, III
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SAWYER
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF PLYMOUTH, NORTH CAROLINA, KENNETH CREQUE and JOANNE FLOYD
Cartwright, et al v. Town of Plymouth, North Carolina, et al
as 2:2014cv00039
Plaintiff:
Robert Cartwright and Jonathan Sawyer
Defendant:
Town of Plymouth, North Carolina , Kenneth Creque and Joanne Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davenport v. Keith et al
as 2:2014cv00036
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Edmond Davenport
Defendant:
Sam Keith , Randy Cartwright , Billy G. Roughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cartwright v. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
as 8:2012cv01978
Plaintiff:
Cynthia S. Cartwright
Defendant:
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
